|
|
|
You can get e-magazine links on WhatsApp. Click here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better realisation for crops would lead to higher incomes for farmers
|
|
Tuesday, 10 July, 2018, 08 : 00 AM [IST]
|
|
Our Bureau, New Delhi
|
The increase in the minimum support price (MSP) may be debated as good politics but bad economics, but the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) opined that better realisations for farmers’ crops would leave them with higher disposable incomes, and would thus give a huge rural demand push to the Indian economy, giving a significant multiplier effect for a large number of sectors like fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), agri implements, irrigation equipment, two-wheelers and others.
“MSP may not be an ideal and a perfect solution to address the farmers’ woes, but the long-term reforms would take long time and our farmers cannot be allowed to suffer that long. The entire rural landscape constitutes about 70 per cent of our consumer basket, and unless they have adequate purchasing power, the much-needed demand push for India Inc would not materialise,” said D S Rawat, secretary general, ASSOCHAM.
“So, given the circumstances that the Indian agriculture is in at the present moment, the government decision to hike the MSP across a large number of crops makes good economics and good politics as well. Reforms in the agriculture sector have remained a missing link, and would require a GST-like paradigm, wherein our farm economy is well integrated amongst different states,” ASSOCHAM said.
Rawat said the concern over MSP increase, leading to inflationary pressure, may well be addressed by improving the administrative machinery in the foodgrains and vegetable mandis, which are still under the clutches of cartels.
The state governments have a key role in demolishing the mandi cartels, which trigger a huge volatility in agri prices, especially those of fruits and vegetables. Unless the agri commodities which constitute the food basket in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) stabilise, the interests of both the consumers and growers would not be protected. The abolition of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act in most states has remained wishful thinking.
ASSOCHAM suggested setting up of a number of procurement and processing companies in public-private partnership (PPP), which can act as a bridge between the farmers and the consumers, which may even be business-to-business (B2B) consumer.
Large players in the organised retail should be encouraged to reach out to farmers and work in partnership with them through contract farming, which should not be a bad word.
“After all, the entire sugarcane economy operates on contract farming, but on a flawed model. Improving on this model, contract farming, enabled by technology would certainly be a long-term solution,” ASSOCHAM said.
“But for now, MSP, which should be administered with an oversight of top leadership, is the immediate solution for removing farmers’ distress,” it added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|