|
|
|
You can get e-magazine links on WhatsApp. Click here
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMFBY issues stricter validation rules for crop-insurance applications under NCIP
|
|
Saturday, 06 December, 2025, 13 : 00 PM [IST]
|
|
Our Bureau, New Delhi
|
The Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare has announced new operational guidelines for the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), requiring that all applications submitted under the National Crop Insurance Portal (NCIP) undergo thorough quality checks and validation before acceptance.
Under the revised norms, each application will be examined to ensure that the “insurable interest” is genuine meaning the applicant must either own the land, or have documented tenancy/share-cropping rights. The insured crop must match the crop actually sown, and the size of the insured land parcel must not exceed the actual area. Additionally, the farmer’s name must exactly match official records such as Aadhaar.
Applications found incomplete, inaccurately filled, or lacking required documentation will be rejected by insurers. In cases where documents are missing, insurers will return the application to the enrolling channel (like CSC centres or banks), giving farmers a chance to resubmit correct information within a specified timeline typically 60 days from the premium debit/enrollment cut-off (July 31for Kharif and December 31 for Rabi).
Farmers who disagree with rejections can appeal via the 24×7 toll-free KrishiRakshak Portal & Helpline (14447), or approach district/tehsil-level agriculture officers or the local District Grievance Redressal Committee. At the state level, similar committees have been set up to review rejections.
These enhanced validation processes aim to better align PMFBY’s administration with its original objectives of providing fair and transparent crop-insurance coverage. By plugging gaps in application quality and discouraging misuse, the government hopes to ensure that only genuine cultivators benefit — thereby strengthening trust in the scheme among farmers and insurers alike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|